--The courts are not the government and have no lawful authority over you.
Why?
Because they are For-Profit Corporations and must have a corporate charter that must comply with the Constitution.
--A challenge to a law can argue that a statute is unconstitutional “facially” or “as applied.” A statute is facially unconstitutional when “no set of circumstances exists under which the Act would be valid.” United States v. Salerno, 481 U.S. 739 (1987).
--Constitutional Law refers to rights carved out in the federal and state constitutions. The majority of this body of law has developed from state and federal supreme court rulings, which interpret their respective constitutions and ensure that the laws passed by the legislature do not violate constitutional limits.
===========
In order to win a Child Protective Services case; we have these remedies available.
The following:
First we need to Create Freedom Documents (especially for court case)
Then:
--Create a DECLARATION of Facts example here
--File a Complaint and Apply For a Writ of Quo Warranto. Quo warranto is Latin for "by what warrant” (or authority). A writ of quo warranto is a common law remedy which is used to challenge a person's right to hold a public or corporate office. A state may also use a quo warranto action to revoke a corporation's charter. Bonnie-Straight-Quo-Warranto
In our Child Protective Services cases we serve [in person] the Supreme Court and the Attorney General to get a declaratory judgment and or testify to the lawful enactment and Constitutionality of the Statutes you are being charged with.
When you are charged with any violation of public policy (code)) the first thing to do is order to show cause. The maxims of law are always true, such as “he who does not deny, admits” or “an unrebutted affidavit stands as truth”, and the system of justice is built around ‘honor and dishonor’. When you receive a ‘presentment’ (document or instrument) making a claim on you (CPS wants your children, or you violated a penal code or vehicle code) you would be in dishonor if you fail to answer it and will receive default judgment.
If you fail to show up at court it is a default judgment. So don’t be in dishonor and question the charge or debt owed.
In the simplest form is would be making a photo copy of the original ‘presentment’ (traffic ticket, court summons, Notice of Default (foreclosure)) and writing in red pen diagonally across it “refused for cause” “per UCC 1-308” then qualify your signature by putting “without prejudice” (this retains all your rights and without it you lose your rights) then “ By authorised representative:” to the left of your signature and then your signature. See Rule of Signatures
If your all capital lettered name is on the presentment, i.e. JOHN H. DOE then that is a ens legis, legal fiction (not living soul) and you are the authorized representative of that corporate fiction, see UCC 3-4021 showing the authorized representative is not liable for the party signed on behalf of, i.e. JOHN DOE. Get a friend or neighbor or anyone ‘not a party to the case’ that is not named or someone who will be called as a ‘witness’, to fill out a ‘proof of service by Mail’ and put you response in the letter and mail it back 1st class, if it isn’t that important, Certified Mail (and include the certified Mail # in the proof of service) if it is more important. If it is very important and will be the best form of evidence at a court case get a green signature receipt card to go with the Certified Mail ($3.50+ $2 for the green card) as this will be allowed as evidence)
See Report With Footnotes Here.pdf
======================
See Also:
Nancy Schaefer's speech CPS corruption. (Nancy and her Husband were Murdered)
Bonnie Straight on corrupt judges, suing corrupt courts & failure to train remedy.
8 U.S. Code § 242 - Deprivation of rights under color of law.
How Police Officers Commit Treason
The Judge is Trustee in the Corrupt Courts
=========================
ON DECEMBER 1, 1990 CONGRESS, MATERIALLY ALTERED THE OATH OF THE JUSTICES AND JUDGES OF THE UNITED STATES ...BY WAY OF AMENDMENT ...so as to relieve them of any duty of faithfulness to obligations, duties, or observances to administer justice under the Constitution and laws of the United States.
FOR ALL THE DETAILS GO HERE (you will be sent to my sister site) http://noauthoritycourts.com/judges-oath-changed-cases-void.html
oathofofficeguide_justicesjudges_120622.pdf
=========================
For more information: Contact Us